What Is Fear? A Journey Through Science, Culture, and Psychology (Deep Dive)
Following Love with Fear
I recently wrote about love. About how it's not just an emotion but our brain's core system for connection and thriving. About how being pulled by love means choosing connection over protection, curiosity over judgment, courage over comfort.
But love is only one side of the equation.
If I'm going to explore where love and fear show up in our world, especially in the lives of men, I need to give fear the same attention I gave love. Because understanding how fear works, where it comes from, and what it does to us is just as crucial as understanding love.
So, I started in the same place. I looked it up in the dictionary. Merriam-Webster says fear is an "unpleasant often strong emotion caused by anticipation or awareness of danger."
That definition feels incomplete. It misses how fear changes over time, how it varies between people, how it can protect us or trap us. It says nothing about how fear gets passed down through generations or how entire societies can be controlled by it.
Fear might be even more complicated than love. And the push of fear might actually be more powerful than the pull of love. After all, fear is designed to help us survive, while love helps us thrive. We need to survive before we can thrive. Our brains prioritize not dying over connecting. That's just biology.
In my Heart-Strong Adventure, I'm exploring what it means to shift from fear-based to love-based living. But you can't shift from something you don't understand. So, I dove into fear with the same curiosity I brought to love. Looking at neuroscience, psychology, culture, history, and spirituality.
What I found changed how I think about fear. And it reinforced my belief that the opposite of love isn't hate. It's fear.
What's Actually Happening in Your Body When You're Afraid
Fear isn't just a feeling. It's a whole-body experience that starts in your brain and spreads everywhere.
At the center of it all is the amygdala. Think of it as your brain's smoke detector. It's constantly scanning for threats. And it's incredibly fast. Research shows it can spot a threatening face in under a tenth of a second.1 That's faster than you can consciously register what you're seeing.
Your brain actually has two fear pathways. The fast one bypasses thinking entirely. See snake, jump back. No thought required. The slow pathway takes a bit longer but gives you context. Is that a snake or a stick?2 This dual system kept our ancestors alive, and it's still running in your brain right now.
But here's where it gets concerning. When you live in constant fear, your brain actually changes. The amygdala grows more reactive. It starts seeing threats everywhere. Meanwhile, your prefrontal cortex, the part that helps you think clearly and make good decisions, actually shrinks.3 Your hippocampus, which helps you remember context and tell real threats from false ones, also gets smaller.4
This is why trauma can change how you see the world for years afterward. Your brain literally rewires itself through neuroplasticity.5
And it's not just your brain. Fear floods your body with stress hormones like cortisol and adrenaline through something called the HPA axis (hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis).6 Great for running from a bear. Not so great when the "bear" is your mortgage payment or a difficult conversation. Chronic fear weakens your immune system. It increases your risk of heart disease. It disrupts your sleep. It creates inflammation throughout your body that speeds up aging.7
Your body doesn't know the difference between a real tiger and a threatening email. It responds the same way.
Why We Fear What We Fear
Evolution programmed us with certain fears for good reason. Our ancestors who weren't afraid of snakes, heights, or being kicked out of the tribe didn't survive long enough to become our ancestors.
This explains something scientists call the "preparedness phenomenon."8 We develop fears of snakes and spiders way faster than fears of cars or electrical outlets. Even though cars are statistically way more dangerous. Your brain is still running software designed for threats that were common 100,000 years ago.
Research by Öhman and Mineka found that we show faster fear conditioning to evolutionarily relevant threats like snakes and angry faces compared to modern dangers like guns or electrical outlets.9 This kind of learning shows up early in childhood and is really hard to unlearn, which tells us it's programmed deep in our evolutionary history.
This creates some weird mismatches in modern life. You might feel intense anxiety about flying, which is incredibly safe, while texting and driving without a second thought. Your brain hasn't caught up to modern risks.
We're also one of the few species that can learn fears without experiencing them directly. Through something called vicarious fear learning, you can develop a fear of sharks just from watching Jaws.10 You can become afraid of flying after hearing about a plane crash on the news. This ability to learn fear through stories and media was helpful when stories warned about real local dangers. Now it means we can develop fears of things we'll never actually encounter. We can even develop fear of entire groups of people we've never met, learning to see them as threats through media and cultural messaging rather than actual experience.
What's really wild is that animals show the same basic fear responses we do.11 But humans have added layers of complexity through language, culture, and that incredible ability to imagine threats that don't exist yet. We're the only species that can lie awake at night worried about something that might happen next year.
How Fear Develops from Birth to Adulthood
Babies start life with something remarkable. For the first few months, they have a suppressed fear response during what researchers call a "sensitive period for attachment learning."12 They need to bond with whoever is taking care of them, even if that care isn't perfect. It's like nature decided that attachment is more important than fear when you're completely helpless.
This connects directly to what I discovered about love. Remember how love and fear can't fully coexist in the brain at the same time? Babies literally can't afford to fear their caregivers. They need connection to survive. So, nature turns down the fear response to allow bonding. You can either fear someone or connect with them, but not both at once.
As kids grow, their fears follow a predictable pattern that makes evolutionary sense. Around 6-8 months, stranger anxiety kicks in.13 Right when babies start crawling and could wander off. Toddlers develop fears of animals. Preschoolers become afraid of the dark and monsters. By adolescence, social fears take over. Being rejected by the group becomes terrifying.14
These aren't random. They're fears that would have protected children at vulnerable developmental stages in our ancestral environment.
But here's the crucial part. How your parents or caregivers responded to you as a baby shapes your fear responses for life. If they were consistently there when you needed them, your brain develops what Bowlby called "secure attachment."15 You learn that when bad things happen, help is available. Your brain builds better connections between the emotional parts and the thinking parts.
If care was inconsistent or scary, your brain adapts differently. Some kids develop anxious attachment, with overactive amygdalae always watching for threats. Others develop avoidant attachment, learning to suppress their needs entirely.16 These patterns stick around into adulthood, affecting relationships, work, and mental health.
Childhood trauma creates particularly deep changes. Kids' brains are incredibly plastic, which means they can adapt to their environment. But that same flexibility means trauma can leave lasting marks.17 Traumatized children often develop enlarged, overreactive amygdalae. Their prefrontal cortex, the brain's brake system, doesn't develop as fully. These changes can last decades.18
Something fascinating about intergenerational trauma. Fear can actually be passed down through generations through epigenetic mechanisms. Studies of Holocaust survivors by Yehuda and colleagues found that trauma changed their genes in ways that showed up in their children.19 Animal research by Dias and Ressler confirms this. If you condition a mouse to fear a certain smell, its grandchildren will fear that smell too.20 Even though they never experienced the original trauma.
Our bodies carry our ancestors' fears. Literally.
How Different Cultures Understand Fear
While the biology of fear looks similar across all humans, how we express and deal with fear varies dramatically between cultures.
Indigenous cultures often have sophisticated systems for managing fear that we're just beginning to appreciate. Indigenous peoples of what we now call the United States recognize different types of courage. Physical bravery is just one kind. There's also spiritual courage, emotional courage, and moral courage. All equally important.21
The Lakota concept of fortitude is about moving forward despite fear, but specifically for the good of the community. Apache traditions teach that real courage requires spiritual backing. You need connection to something greater than yourself.22
Many Indigenous North American cultures share the Seven Sacred Teachings. One of these is the Bear Teaching, which specifically addresses courage. It defines courage as "the ability to face danger, fear, or changes with confidence and bravery."23 They don't try to eliminate fear. They transform it through community support and spiritual practice.
The difference between collectivist and individualist cultures is huge when it comes to fear. In individualist societies like the U.S., we tend to see fear as a personal problem requiring individual solutions. Go to therapy. Work on yourself. Figure it out.
Collectivist cultures handle fear through the group. There are social norms about when and how to express fear. Community rituals for dealing with shared threats. The group helps regulate individual fear responses.24
Some fears only exist in specific cultures. In Japan, there's something called Taijin Kyofusho. It's an intense fear of offending others that reflects how important social harmony is in Japanese culture.25 In Cambodia, there's Khyâl Cap, or "wind attacks." These are panic attacks that Cambodians understand as wind-like substances flowing through the body and rising to the head, causing dizziness, anxiety, and fear that blood vessels might burst.26 These aren't just different names for the same fears. They're completely different experiences shaped by cultural beliefs.
How Fear Has Shaped Human History
Fear has been used as a tool of control throughout human history. And the patterns are remarkably consistent.
Take the witch trials. Between 1400 and 1782, an estimated 40,000 to 60,000 people were executed for witchcraft.27 Most were women who were already marginalized. The pattern was always the same. Something bad happens, like crop failure or disease. Someone identifies a scapegoat, usually someone who doesn't fit in. Authorities and media amplify the threat. Public demands extreme responses. New laws and institutions get created that outlast the original panic.
Sound familiar?
The first documented "moral panic" happened in London in 1744.28 There was a small increase in crime, but media coverage made it seem like society was collapsing. People demanded harsh punishments that far exceeded the actual threat. This pattern has repeated over and over.
Different historical periods have different fear profiles. Before industrialization, people feared supernatural threats and natural disasters. During the industrial age, they feared technology and class conflict. The modern era brought fears of nuclear war and cultural change. Now we fear artificial intelligence, global connectivity, and identity threats.29
What's consistent is that fear serves two purposes. It legitimately protects against real threats. But it's also systematically used for political and social control. Understanding these patterns helps us evaluate whether current fears are proportional to actual threats.
The Masculine Paradox: Fearlessness Built on Fear
Here's where fear gets really complicated for men. Many men are taught from birth that real men don't feel fear. But that teaching itself is delivered through fear.
Boys learn early that showing vulnerable emotions leads to consequences. Social rejection. Physical aggression. Being called weak or feminine. So, they adapt. They turn fear into anger or just shut down emotionally. Not because they're naturally that way, but because they're afraid of what happens if they show fear.30
Researchers call this "precarious masculinity."31 Manhood is seen as something you can lose. It requires constant proof. And when men feel their masculinity is threatened, their fear responses spike. This often comes out as aggression, emotional withdrawal, or doubling down on masculine behaviors.
The fear of appearing feminine becomes a core driver. It shapes everything from career choices to friendships to how men handle stress. Boys definitely learn this fear through cultural conditioning. But it's not all learned behavior. Scientists like Carole Hooven have shown that testosterone affects how boys and men act too. It's probably both. The hormone influences certain behaviors, and then society reinforces or punishes those behaviors.32
Traditional masculine conditioning systematically redirects vulnerable emotions. Fear becomes anger. Sadness becomes withdrawal. Need becomes self-reliance. Over time, many men develop what researchers call "normative male alexithymia."33 That's a fancy way of saying they literally can't identify or express their emotions. Not won't. Can't. The conditioning runs that deep.
Men who strongly follow traditional masculine norms show increased "fear of emotions."34 They're not just avoiding feelings. They're afraid of them. This correlates with all kinds of mental health problems. Depression. Anxiety. Substance abuse. Violence.35
Here's the tragic irony. Men face higher rates of suicide, addiction, and violent death. But fear of appearing weak stops them from getting help. Many men avoid talking about mental health or seeking help, often due to stigma and masculine norms.30, 35, 36 The main reason? Embarrassment and stigma. Fear of being seen as less of a man.
The very thing meant to make men strong, this fearlessness, is actually built on fear. And it's killing them.
How Different Spiritual Traditions Work with Fear
Spiritual and religious traditions worldwide have developed sophisticated approaches to fear. They don't see it as something to eliminate but as something to understand and transform.
Eastern traditions generally approach fear through non-attachment. Buddhism teaches that fear comes from clinging to things that are temporary and identifying too strongly with the ego. Mindfulness meditation helps you observe fear without being consumed by it.37 There's a practice called tonglen where you breathe in suffering and breathe out peace. It transforms fear into compassion.
Hinduism sees fear of death and change as coming from ignorance of your true nature. The practices focus on expanding your identity beyond the individual self. When you realize you're part of something larger, individual fears lose their grip.38
Western religions tend to focus on relationship and connection. Christianity teaches that "perfect love casts out fear" (1 John 4:18). What this means is that when you're fully connected to love, whether that's divine love or deep human connection, fear can't take hold in the same way. It's not about never feeling afraid. It's about having something stronger than fear to anchor you. Christian practices like prayer, community worship, and meditation on scripture help people stay connected to that love when fear tries to take over.39
Indigenous wisdom traditions have particularly sophisticated understandings of fear. They see it as a messenger that needs attention, not an enemy to defeat. Ceremonies and rituals provide structured ways to encounter and integrate fears with community support.40
Aboriginal Australians include fear in Dreamtime stories that teach moral behavior and cultural knowledge. African traditions deal with fears through community identification and ritual cleansing. The fear isn't denied or suppressed. It's acknowledged and moved through collective action. By "transformed," they mean the fear doesn't disappear but changes from something that paralyzes you into something that teaches you. The community helps you face the fear, understand its message, and integrate that wisdom so the fear no longer controls you.41
What all these traditions share is the recognition that fear is natural and changeable. They emphasize connection to something greater than individual ego. They provide specific practices for transformation. And they surround individuals with community support.
How Modern Systems Exploit Our Fears
We live in an age where fear is at a new scale and speed.
Marketing companies have developed very sophisticated ways to trigger fear responses. Research by Tannenbaum and colleagues shows fear-based marketing works. They analyzed 127 studies and found that fear appeals have a moderate but consistent impact on changing people's attitudes and behaviors.42 It triggers your amygdala, overriding rational decision-making. Scarcity marketing exploits survival instincts. "Only 3 left in stock!" "Offer ends tonight!" Your ancient brain thinks resources are running out.43
Social media algorithms might be the most sophisticated fear exploitation systems ever created. These algorithms prioritize content that generates "engagement." And nothing engages like fear, anger, and outrage.44 Research shows the platforms amplify divisive, emotionally charged content way more than users actually want to see it.45 They create filter bubbles that reinforce existing fears while cutting you off from different perspectives.
Political systems have long used fear, but modern technology makes it much more effective. Digital targeting allows politicians to send different fear messages to different groups based on their specific anxieties. Bots and fake accounts amplify fear-based messages, making fringe views seem mainstream. The speed of social media means fear can spread faster than fact-checkers can respond. And algorithms ensure the most emotionally triggering content gets the widest reach.46
Studies show fear-based political appeals increase support for authoritarian measures and "strong" leaders. They create rally-around-the-flag effects where people trust government more during perceived threats. Politicians can create moral panics about specific groups to justify policy changes.47 They provide "security theater" that looks protective but doesn't actually make anyone safer.
The modern economy runs on attention, and fear captures attention better than almost anything else. News media amplifies perceived risks far beyond actual threat levels.48 This creates collective misperceptions about what's actually dangerous. It contributes to political polarization and social fragmentation. And it erodes social trust through constant threat messaging.49
We're surrounded by systems designed to keep us afraid. Not because we're actually in danger, but because fear is profitable and useful for control.
How Fear Interacts with Other Emotions
Fear rarely travels alone. It interacts with other emotions in complex ways that affect mental health and relationships.
Fear and shame create particularly toxic combinations. Shame acts like emotional glue. It sticks to other feelings and prevents them from completing their natural cycle.50 When shame binds with fear, you get stuck in loops. You're afraid, then ashamed of being afraid, which makes you more afraid. This combination shows up a lot in trauma and requires special therapeutic approaches to untangle.
Fear and anger share neural pathways in the brain. Studies by Moons and colleagues show that inducing fear significantly increases anger responses.51 Specific brain regions light up during fear that predict later aggressive behavior.52 In trauma, fear often leads to defensive anger. But chronic anger frequently masks underlying fears about vulnerability or loss.
Fear and grief have an important relationship in trauma processing. Fear is about what might happen. Grief is about what already has. But fear responses can get stuck when underlying grief goes unprocessed.53 You stay afraid because you haven't grieved what you've lost.
Fear often functions as a cover for more vulnerable emotions. Fear of intimacy might actually be fear of abandonment stemming from early attachment wounds. Fear of failure might be covering shame about not being good enough.54 Understanding these layers is crucial for healing. If you only address the surface fear without exploring what's underneath, relief is usually temporary.
Evidence-Based Approaches to Transforming Fear
Modern psychology has developed multiple effective approaches for working with fear. Each has strengths for different situations.
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) is considered the gold standard for many anxiety disorders. It works by identifying and changing thought patterns that maintain fear. Exposure therapy, a type of CBT, involves gradually facing feared situations in a controlled way. This allows new learning to compete with old fear associations.55 Research shows it's particularly effective for specific phobias and obsessive-compulsive disorder.
Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) has proven especially effective for trauma-related fears. High-quality reviews show EMDR is at least as effective as CBT for PTSD, with some evidence of greater reductions in intrusion and arousal symptoms.56 In some trials, similar gains are reached in fewer sessions.57 It works by reprocessing traumatic memories while your eyes move back and forth, somehow allowing your brain to file the memories differently.
Somatic Experiencing focuses on body sensations rather than thoughts or emotions. It helps people complete defensive responses that got interrupted during trauma. The approach uses "pendulation," gently moving between activation and calm states.58 This helps the nervous system learn it can handle activation without getting stuck. Research shows promising results for trauma symptoms.
Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) takes a different approach. Instead of trying to eliminate fear, it helps you develop a different relationship with it. You learn to have fear thoughts and sensations without being controlled by them.59 Studies show it's as effective as CBT, particularly for people who don't respond well to purely cognitive approaches.
Mindfulness-based interventions combine Eastern contemplative practices with Western psychology. They help you observe fear responses without judgment while staying present.60 Research confirms effectiveness across diverse populations. They're particularly helpful for people seeking alternatives to talk therapy.
Psychodynamic therapy explores unconscious patterns and early attachment relationships that fuel fear responses. Recent analyses found it significantly more effective than no treatment, with results comparable to other therapies.61 It's particularly useful for complex, long-standing fear patterns rooted in early experiences.
There's something fascinating happening in the world of fear and trauma treatment. Substances like psilocybin (magic mushrooms), MDMA (ecstasy), and ketamine are showing remarkable results when combined with therapy. We're talking about 67-92% improvement rates for people with treatment-resistant PTSD and depression, compared to 32-48% with traditional approaches.62
What makes these substances different is how they work. They create windows of enhanced brain plasticity. Basically, your brain becomes more flexible and open to forming new patterns for weeks or even months after a single session.63 Psilocybin helps your brain's fear circuits learn new patterns by activating serotonin receptors in unique ways. MDMA floods your system with oxytocin and serotonin, making it easier to process traumatic memories without being overwhelmed by fear. Ketamine creates a surge of glutamate that helps rebuild stress-damaged connections in your brain.64
The research is compelling enough that the FDA has granted "breakthrough therapy" status to several psychedelic treatments, though we're still working through the regulatory process. Oregon’s licensed psilocybin services are live; Colorado began licensing facilitators in 2025; Australia’s TGA allowed authorized psychiatrists to prescribe MDMA (PTSD) and psilocybin (treatment-resistant depression) starting July 1, 2023.65 These aren't party drugs anymore. They're carefully controlled therapeutic tools used with trained professionals in structured settings.
Of course, these substances aren't for everyone and come with real risks that need careful screening and monitoring. But for people whose fear and trauma haven't responded to other treatments, they're offering something we haven't seen before: the possibility of significant healing in just a few sessions rather than years of therapy.66
The key insight? Different approaches work for different people. The best technique is the one you'll actually do.
So, What Is Fear, Really?
After diving deep into fear, I've come to understand that fear is far more than Merriam-Webster's "unpleasant emotion caused by anticipation of danger."
Fear is our most ancient survival system. It's a biological inheritance that kept our ancestors alive and continues to shape every aspect of our experience. It's the push that drives us away from threats, real or imagined.
Fear is what happens when your brain chooses protection over connection. When it prioritizes surviving over thriving. When it decides that staying safe matters more than staying open.
But fear is also information. It tells us about boundaries that need respect. Values that feel threatened. Vulnerabilities that need attention. It's not just an alarm system. It's a messenger about what matters to us.
Fear operates through intricate biological systems we're only beginning to understand. It shapes our bodies through stress hormones and neural pathways. It gets passed down through generations in ways that would have seemed like science fiction just decades ago. It varies across cultures but follows universal patterns. It can be exploited and manipulated, but also transformed and integrated.
The dictionary definition doesn't capture fear's complexity. Fear isn't just an unpleasant emotion. It's a sophisticated biological system, a cultural construct, a spiritual teacher, and an existential challenge all at once. It's the force that has shaped human history, driven evolution, and continues to influence almost every choice we make.
What Does It Mean to Be Controlled by Fear?
Being controlled by fear means living life in a constant state of protection. It means your ancient alarm system is running the show, making decisions based on threats that might not even be real.
When you're controlled by fear, you contract instead of expand. You defend instead of explore. You isolate instead of connect. You grasp instead of release.
Being controlled by fear shows up as avoiding difficult conversations because they might be uncomfortable. Staying in situations that don't serve you because change feels too risky. Choosing the familiar over the fulfilling. Living in constant worry about future possibilities rather than being present to what actually is.
For many men, being controlled by fear looks like emotional shutdown. Like choosing anger over vulnerability because anger feels safer. Like avoiding help because asking feels weak. Like performing strength while dying inside.
Being controlled by fear means your nervous system stays activated. Your body floods with stress hormones. Your immune system weakens. Your relationships suffer. Your world gets smaller.
It means you're surviving but not thriving. Existing but not living. Protected but not connected.
But here's what gives me hope. Understanding fear this deeply has shown me it's not permanent. These patterns can change. The same neuroplasticity that allows fear to rewire our brains also allows for healing and transformation.
When we understand what fear really is, when we see how it operates, when we recognize its patterns in our lives, we can start to develop a different relationship with it.
I don't want to eliminate fear. That would be dangerous. Fear is an important alert system that keeps us safe from real threats. The goal isn't to never feel fear. It's to understand what fear actually is: a messenger, not a master. When we recognize fear as information about potential danger rather than truth about certain doom, we can assess whether the threat is real or imagined, whether protection is actually needed or if we're just replaying old patterns.
That's the journey I'm on in my Heart-Strong Adventure. Learning to acknowledge fear without being ruled by it. To hear its message without being hijacked by it. To respect its protective function while being open to the idea that protection is not always what I need.
Because on the other side of fear isn't fearlessness. It's choice. It's the ability to feel afraid and act anyway. To be scared and stay open. To recognize danger and still choose connection when it's safe to do so.
That's what I'm exploring. And that's what I hope we can all learn together.
If this stirred something, I'd love to hear what came up for you. And if you haven't read my exploration of love yet, you might find it helpful to see the other side of this equation.
References
1. LeDoux, J. (2015). Anxious: Using the Brain to Understand and Treat Fear and Anxiety. Viking.
2. LeDoux, J. E. (1996). The Emotional Brain: The Mysterious Underpinnings of Emotional Life. Simon & Schuster.
3. Arnsten, A. F. (2009). Stress signalling pathways that impair prefrontal cortex structure and function. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 10(6), 410-422.
4. McEwen, B. S. (2007). Physiology and neurobiology of stress and adaptation: Central role of the brain. Physiological Reviews, 87(3), 873-904.
5. Davidson, R. J., & McEwen, B. S. (2012). Social influences on neuroplasticity: Stress and interventions to promote well-being. Nature Neuroscience, 15(5), 689-695.
6. Smith, S. M., & Vale, W. W. (2006). The role of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis in neuroendocrine responses to stress. Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, 8(4), 383-395.
7. Segerstrom, S. C., & Miller, G. E. (2004). Psychological stress and the human immune system: A meta-analytic study of 30 years of inquiry. Psychological Bulletin, 130(4), 601-630.
8. Seligman, M. E. (1971). Phobias and preparedness. Behavior Therapy, 2(3), 307-320.
9. Öhman, A., & Mineka, S. (2001). Fears, phobias, and preparedness: Toward an evolved module of fear and fear learning. Psychological Review, 108(3), 483-522.
10. Olsson, A., & Phelps, E. A. (2007). Social learning of fear. Nature Neuroscience, 10(9), 1095-1102.
11. Gross, C. T., & Canteras, N. S. (2012). The many paths to fear. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 13(9), 651-658.
12. Sullivan, R. M., & Holman, P. J. (2010). Transitions in sensitive period attachment learning in infancy: The role of corticosterone. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 34(6), 835-844.
13. Ainsworth, M. D. S., Blehar, M. C., Waters, E., & Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of Attachment: A Psychological Study of the Strange Situation. Lawrence Erlbaum.
14. Gullone, E. (2000). The development of normal fear: A century of research. Clinical Psychology Review, 20(4), 429-451.
15. Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and Loss: Vol. 1. Attachment. Basic Books.
16. Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2007). Attachment in Adulthood: Structure, Dynamics, and Change. Guilford Press.
17. Teicher, M. H., Samson, J. A., Anderson, C. M., & Ohashi, K. (2016). The effects of childhood maltreatment on brain structure, function and connectivity. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 17(10), 652-666.
18. van der Kolk, B. A. (2014). The Body Keeps the Score: Brain, Mind, and Body in the Healing of Trauma. Viking.
19. Yehuda, R., Daskalakis, N. P., Bierer, L. M., Bader, H. N., Klengel, T., Holsboer, F., & Binder, E. B. (2016). Holocaust exposure induced intergenerational effects on FKBP5 methylation. Biological Psychiatry, 80(5), 372-380.
20. Dias, B. G., & Ressler, K. J. (2014). Parental olfactory experience influences behavior and neural structure in subsequent generations. Nature Neuroscience, 17(1), 89-96.
21. Mohatt, G. V., Fok, C. C. T., Henry, D., & Allen, J. (2014). Feasibility of a community intervention for the prevention of suicide and alcohol abuse with Yup'ik Alaska Native youth. American Journal of Community Psychology, 54(1-2), 153-169.
22. Ball, J. (2004). As if Indigenous knowledge and communities mattered: Transformative education in First Nations communities in Canada. American Indian Quarterly, 28(3/4), 454-479.
23. Toulouse, P. R. (2016). What matters in Indigenous education: Implementing a vision committed to holism, diversity and engagement. People for Education.
24. Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture's Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Across Nations. Sage Publications.
25. Kleinknecht, R. A., Dinnel, D. L., Kleinknecht, E. E., Hiruma, N., & Harada, N. (1997). Cultural factors in social anxiety: A comparison of social phobia symptoms and Taijin Kyofusho. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 11(2), 157-177.
26. Hinton, D. E., Pich, V., Marques, L., Nickerson, A., & Pollack, M. H. (2010). Khyâl attacks: A key idiom of distress among traumatized Cambodia refugees. Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry, 34(2), 244-278.
27. Levack, B. P. (2015). The Witch-Hunt in Early Modern Europe. Routledge.
28. Cohen, S. (2002). Folk Devils and Moral Panics: The Creation of the Mods and Rockers. Routledge.
29. Bourke, J. (2005). Fear: A Cultural History. Virago Press.
30. Addis, M. E., & Mahalik, J. R. (2003). Men, masculinity, and the contexts of help seeking. American Psychologist, 58(1), 5-14.
31. Vandello, J. A., & Bosson, J. K. (2013). Hard won and easily lost: A review and synthesis of theory and research on precarious manhood. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 14(2), 101-113.
32. O'Neil, J. M. (2008). Summarizing 25 years of research on men's gender role conflict using the Gender Role Conflict Scale. The Counseling Psychologist, 36(3), 358-445.
33. Levant, R. F. (1992). Toward the reconstruction of masculinity. Journal of Family Psychology, 5(3-4), 379-402.
34. Jakupcak, M., Tull, M. T., & Roemer, L. (2005). Masculinity, shame, and fear of emotions as predictors of men's expressions of anger and hostility. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 6(4), 275-284.
35. Wong, Y. J., Ho, M. H. R., Wang, S. Y., & Miller, I. S. (2017). Meta-analyses of the relationship between conformity to masculine norms and mental health-related outcomes. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 64(1), 80-93.
36. National Institute of Mental Health. (2023). Men and Mental Health. NIMH.
37. Kabat-Zinn, J. (2003). Mindfulness-based interventions in context: Past, present, and future. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 10(2), 144-156.
38. Easwaran, E. (2007). The Bhagavad Gita. Nilgiri Press.
39. Bourgeault, C. (2004). Centering Prayer and Inner Awakening. Cowley Publications.
40. Duran, E., & Duran, B. (1995). Native American Postcolonial Psychology. State University of New York Press.
41. Some, M. P. (1998). The Healing Wisdom of Africa. Tarcher/Putnam.
42. Tannenbaum, M. B., Hepler, J., Zimmerman, R. S., Saul, L., Jacobs, S., Wilson, K., et al. (2015). Appealing to fear: A meta-analysis of fear appeal effectiveness and theories. Psychological Bulletin, 141(6), 1178-1204.
43. Cialdini, R. B. (2009). Influence: Science and Practice (5th ed.). Pearson.
44. Brady, W. J., Wills, J. A., Jost, J. T., Tucker, J. A., & Van Bavel, J. J. (2017). Emotion shapes the diffusion of moralized content in social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(28), 7313-7318.
45. Rathje, S., Van Bavel, J. J., & van der Linden, S. (2021). Out-group animosity drives engagement on social media. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(26), e2024292118.
46. Jost, J. T., Stern, C., Rule, N. O., & Sterling, J. (2017). The politics of fear: Is there an ideological asymmetry in existential motivation? Social Cognition, 35(4), 324-353.
47. Albertson, B., & Gadarian, S. K. (2015). Anxious Politics: Democratic Citizenship in a Threatening World. Cambridge University Press.
48. Altheide, D. L. (2002). Creating Fear: News and the Construction of Crisis. Aldine de Gruyter.
49. Glassner, B. (2018). The Culture of Fear: Why Americans Are Afraid of the Wrong Things (Revised ed.). Basic Books.
50. Scheff, T. J. (2000). Shame and the social bond: A sociological theory. Sociological Theory, 18(1), 84-99.
51. Moons, W. G., Eisenberger, N. I., & Taylor, S. E. (2010). Anger and fear responses to stress have different biological profiles. Brain, Behavior, and Immunity, 24(2), 215-219.
52. Carré, J. M., Fisher, P. M., Manuck, S. B., & Hariri, A. R. (2012). Interaction between trait anxiety and trait anger predict amygdala reactivity to angry facial expressions in men but not women. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 7(2), 213-221.
53. Shear, M. K. (2015). Complicated grief. New England Journal of Medicine, 372(2), 153-160.
54. Greenberg, L. S. (2015). Emotion-Focused Therapy: Coaching Clients to Work Through Their Feelings (2nd ed.). American Psychological Association.
55. Hofmann, S. G., Asnaani, A., Vonk, I. J., Sawyer, A. T., & Fang, A. (2012). The efficacy of cognitive behavioral therapy: A review of meta-analyses. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 36(5), 427-440.
56. Chen, Y. R., Hung, K. W., Tsai, J. C., Chu, H., Chung, M. H., Chen, S. R., et al. (2014). Efficacy of eye-movement desensitization and reprocessing for patients with posttraumatic-stress disorder: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS One, 9(8), e103676.
57. De Jongh, A., Ernst, R., Marques, L., & Hornsveld, H. (2013). The impact of eye movements and tones on disturbing memories involving PTSD and other mental disorders. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 44(4), 477-483.
58. Payne, P., Levine, P. A., & Crane-Godreau, M. A. (2015). Somatic experiencing: Using interoception and proprioception as core elements of trauma therapy. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 93.
59. A-Tjak, J. G., Davis, M. L., Morina, N., Powers, M. B., Smits, J. A., & Emmelkamp, P. M. (2015). A meta-analysis of the efficacy of acceptance and commitment therapy for clinically relevant mental and physical health problems. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 84(1), 30-36.
60. Goyal, M., Singh, S., Sibinga, E. M., Gould, N. F., Rowland-Seymour, A., Sharma, R., et al. (2014). Meditation programs for psychological stress and well-being: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Internal Medicine, 174(3), 357-368.
61. Leichsenring, F., & Rabung, S. (2008). Effectiveness of long-term psychodynamic psychotherapy: A meta-analysis. JAMA, 300(13), 1551-1565.
62. Mitchell, J. M., et al. (2023). MDMA-assisted therapy for moderate to severe PTSD: a randomized, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. *Nature Medicine*, 29, 2162–2172.
63. Carhart-Harris, R. L., & Goodwin, G. M. (2017). The therapeutic potential of psychedelic drugs: Past, present, and future. Neuropsychopharmacology, 42(11), 2105-2113.
64. Vollenweider, F. X., & Preller, K. H. (2020). Psychedelic drugs: Neurobiology and potential for treatment of psychiatric disorders. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 21(11), 611-624.
65. Oregon Health Authority. (2024). Oregon Psilocybin Services: Annual Report. State of Oregon. Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration. (2023). Authorized Prescriber Scheme for MDMA and Psilocybin.
66. Johnson, M. W., Richards, W. A., & Griffiths, R. R. (2008). Human hallucinogen research: Guidelines for safety. Journal of Psychopharmacology, 22(6), 603-620.
An awesome article- I like how deep depth you took in exploring one of my favorite topics Fear. Enlightening details